ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Why is NW0 going for b8? BTV had that bunker last round !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 Hey, yeah we want to compete for 2nd ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Go for b6 BTV had b8 BTV is our ally !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 thats fine, its just a competition no base attacks, no tiles etc ScenicRoute05/28/2020 FLY will support BTV at b8 B6 has not been claimed !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 let me check it we have allies with arb ScenicRoute05/28/2020 We have NAP with ARB B6 is open !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 they will go to bunker 6 ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Ok then you will face FLY at b8 You will not get b8 BTV bunker They had that bunker last round !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 So? we had 11th and compete with Cru having nap with them ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Then go for b6 ARB is #10 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 ally with arb :slight_smile: ScenicRoute05/28/2020 So? Compete is what you said !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 sure but in that case its ally vs nap thing, i think you should understand this ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I think you should understand you are #6 and claiming a facility Fight for b8 You will fight FLY !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 you know thats better than me that its pure numbers of possibly inactive/less active players is it your sister alliance or 2nd alliance? ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Yes BTV is I already stated that BTV had b8 last round !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 Why dont they state that on their motto, its confusing ScenicRoute05/28/2020 No reason for NW0 to go for b8 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 reason is - no more than 2, currently we have 1 ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I am not going to argue this. If you go to b8, you will face FLY !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 and BTV info was posted few mins ago Sure, i ll consider and let you know about changes ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I asked over 24hrs ago about changes to bunkers NW0 did not list any changes Why change to b8? You did not have b8 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 we dont change - we show interest during registration ScenicRoute05/28/2020 You didn’t have b8 BTV did That is a change !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 We did have +1 attempt each week, you or cru or we didnt have our bunkers at once, dont want to argue - BTV was not looking as strong contender, untill you tell at the last moment that you ready to transfer your members there ScenicRoute05/28/2020 You are #6 ARB is #10 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 in that case we will go for 10th as none of us had this bunker before ScenicRoute05/28/2020 BTV is going for b10 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 yep and they have b8 ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Why you wish to make this so difficult is beyond me B6 is open Go for b6 It has not been claimed !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 You are #6 BTV #7 they have b8 as you stated ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Yes BTV is #7 but ARB #10 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 we dont contest it and will go to 10 instead ScenicRoute05/28/2020 BTV is taking b10 Go to b6 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 arb want to go to 6 ScenicRoute05/28/2020 ARB is #10 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 does the place define competetness? ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I will talk to BTV but I will also not forget this This is twice you have caused an issue for me !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 your way: BTV should keep b8 and claim b10 uncontested At the same time you denying contest for #6 contender i dont get it rly ScenicRoute05/28/2020 You should think before causing any more issues for me. There may come a day where you need help !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 Scenic with all my respect you trying to turn the situation in your own favor, yes - your alliance is the unconditional power at the top 1, but you denying contest for other contenders and promote favourable ones ScenicRoute05/28/2020 No I am not !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 i.e you telling me: "sit on your facilities or fight with your ally" and dont even try to contend #7 because we will cover them ScenicRoute05/28/2020 You are once again trying to force YOUR agenda on other alliances like you did with ROG at facility #2 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 thats what it looks like ScenicRoute05/28/2020 No reason for NWO to go for a different bunker The rewards rotate !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 No reason for BTV to go for a different bunker - same logic ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Go take the bunker you had before and if you wish to add another, b6 is open BTV has b8 !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 yep and we b2 ScenicRoute05/28/2020 BTV is going for b10 where RAi was !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 And we have same rights and as you said #6 contender at least ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I have not forgotten what you did at facility #2 I will also not forget this if you continue Next time you need someone to stay out, you may find they don’t !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 Should we start to return to the same circle again? i tho we discussed that already :rofl: ScenicRoute05/28/2020 NW0 can take b6 ARB has not said they are taking anything B6 is open !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 you being "bully" in terms of state rules right now ScenicRoute05/28/2020 :joy::joy::joy: This is coming from you? What you did at facility #2 :joy::joy::joy: Please !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 what was that lol? ScenicRoute05/28/2020 You are once again wanting to get your way This is one time you need to compromise like the rest of us do I have stated it is not an open bunker But you wish to keep pushing I have not said, oh Fly wants facility 2 I have not said oh FLY will switch bunkers !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 cmon dont make put :rofl: again, you taking things and discussions too close ScenicRoute05/28/2020 You are #6 but have a facility Now you want a bunker that another alliance has claimed Greedy much? The top alliances agreed to only take a specific amount and that was so others can grow You are not a top alliance !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 greedy? fine 8th was BTV last round, 10th already open ScenicRoute05/28/2020 1 facility and 1 bunker is good for #6 If you want more, go for b6 Seems simple enough !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 now you start to decide what is enough or what is not, we r going nowhere let me take a look and i will tell you soon ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Ok then I will speak with the other top alliances about our agreement on facilities !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 morning is better to make decisions i amd going to sleep soon ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I am not asking anything unreasonable and have offered you another option that still gives you bunkers !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 2am will tell you with fresh mind !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 GMorning You are right, this is reasonable, but in this case, if we dispute bunker 6 together with the allies, it will look exactly as if you would dispute the BTV bunker for example. I have a proposal. I would like to ask you to consider ally relations. For us it will be a reliable rear, for you the opportunity to have an extra ally in future battles. In this case, each of us will receive an advantage, BTV will not have any issues, and will benefit from this without any possible stronger(than them) contenders for the bunker, and good relations will be positive income for us which we(and i personally) value more than possible claiming of another bunker. Thus, this will be a good occasion for mutual development of relations as an excellent way out of the situation, what do you say? ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Good morning We become allies so that you do not take a bunker that BTV has in their possession? I am legitimately asking that you not contest a bunker that another alliance has in their possession currently and this is your solution? This is reasonable to you? Please explain how becoming an ally to an alliance that has not earned my respect is beneficial to FLY? !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 I am talking in perspective and cooperation within the framework of the current positions, if we even have disagreements, I personally try to find solutions in the dialogue, because without discussion there are no ways to understand each other. We have already found a mutual point of view in the past for an issue and I trust your word and position. As i see current situation - TRK and CRU and YOU are now the main poles of power, the TRK has a ROG and a number of other members, you have a BTV, CRU has a strong academy. I I personally prefer your disciplined and truthful policy, therefore, if you have interest in an alliance that is active and ready to support you as needed in the future, as you can see, we can well discuss decisions without the need to uphold the points of view. We are not going to contest currently possessed bunker if its matters, not interested in crossing your interests As for the disputed bunkers, then again, confronting interests with yours is unreasonable, to claim the interest of an ally means to test his loyalty, but as an active and sufficiently strong team that has all the strength for this, there will be no possible choices left, therefore I wanted to propose combining such efforts in the future so that we have a common goal ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I will take this request to my r4s but this sounds more like an attempt to gain what you want through manipulation and I do not approve of those type of tactics !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 No attempts, take a look what i previously what conclusions have i come to, and i am always being honest without tricky moves, maybe I'm not expressing myself "directly enough" - so we have an opportunity but dont want to cross interest with those whose policies impress us the most, instead we are looking to grow and contest in the future common goals ScenicRoute05/28/2020 I was messaged by someone in Nw0 about an attack. Nw0 is not in top 10 I also have no record of any attack in my log ScenicRoute05/28/2020 Why am I being told that because Nw0 is your sister alliance, that they are covered by top 10 NAP? That is a big no FLY has NAP with TOP 10 not TOP 10 and whoever else they decide to add !gﾉﾚｲ!05/28/2020 Here, was in gym and received tons of PM Yeah Academy leader drop this info to me ScenicRouteYesterday at 2:37 PM I am not sure who is sending my players messages trying to recruit but I consider this rude. Please ask your members to stop !gﾉﾚｲ!Yesterday at 2:58 PM Why you asking me, have no idea, maybe someone just joking :smile: I ll login a little bit later and ask, but it sounds quite funny imo !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 8:14 AM BTV bunker They had that bunker last round I have stated it is not an open bunker Now you want a bunker that another alliance has claimed Greedy much? The top alliances agreed to only take a specific amount and that was so others can grow How does that looks now in terms of registering for Structure that our Alliance had last round? :wink: ScenicRouteToday at 2:11 PM What are you going on about? ScenicRouteToday at 3:15 PM FLY is only registered for our buildings I do not appreciate your accusations However, I can register for NW0 buildings and then take them if that is what you really want me to do So now this leave you in the position of retracting your words and apologizing for the wrongful accusation Btw I can prove what buildings FLY has registered for It also does not matter what FLY registers for as there is nothing against registering for buildings as that is not what anyone agreed to !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 4:53 PM so much contrived text it leaves me in position of no accusation done to you specifically - if you see opposite - please show me where i accuse you ScenicRouteToday at 5:00 PM That right there You have no way of knowing what buildings FLY has registered for The game does not show you that information That information is ONLY available to the leaders of that alliance Also the ONLY buildings FLY is registered for are the auto registered So all of your words you chose to write here has only caused you to lose the NAP with FLY !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:03 PM i do able to read what is written, could you now show me the place where i accuse YOU of registering ScenicRouteToday at 5:04 PM Already have What are you going on about? This is where I asked what you were talking about. No answer. So that leaves your words open to interpretation. You still have not answered nor explained your words ..... therefore my words stand !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:14 PM Try again - because you draw conclusions based on your own words interpretation and then attribute them to me, The original mentioned by you -message concerned the registration of FBV and their registration on our Facility. And yeah - you mentioned it earlier, i dont have ability to know which structure you registered for, as this information belong to your alliance if not shared. my message - !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 8:14 AM, your message - ScenicRouteToday at 2:11 PM. I am able to wait for answer 6 hours without the need of making interpretations ScenicRouteToday at 5:20 PM First of all you back up Secondly you are way out of line with me and have been for little bit now Thirdly you still have yet to figure out a way to rewrite your words from the previous bunker/facility Fourthly, I am not here for you to play word games with Until you can rewrite your words, there will be no NAP between FLY and NW0 my message - !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 8:14 AM, your message - ScenicRouteToday at 2:11 PM. I am able to wait for answer 6 hours without the need of making interpretations oint_up_2:oint_up_2:oint_up_2:oint_up_2: That bullshit right there. Not necessary nor needed. You can apologize or you can get buggered You do NOT want war with me !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:33 PM i dont know what back up you mean. . Quoted words are your own - were made from your own conversation and position on the bunker just week ago. My question concerned concerned the position you made about registering the occupied stuctures of another alliance, as now FBV did. Its pretty straight quetion, however you making long a long series of conclusions and you ascribe to me what is not in the question - accusations against your side ScenicRouteToday at 5:34 PM FBV spoke on what they plan to register for and you bring it to me? :joy::joy::joy: Last time I attempted to speak between NW0 and FBV you tried to blackmail me into an alliance between NW0 and FLY :joy::joy: FBV is allied with FLY but they wish to challenge for that facility FLY did NOTHING and has NOTHING to do with that situation so you are so very WRONG to bring this to my doorstep especially after the last time !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:37 PM Do you asked me when we register to their bunker and stated your own position? Do you ask to hold on and take another? ScenicRouteToday at 5:37 PM You also have NOT done anything about you or your alliance trying to recruit my members. This is an issue as my members are COMPLAINING about it As r5, you SHOULD be able to address this with YOUR members Do you asked me when we register to their bunker and stated your own position? Do you ask to hold on and take another? Again, this led to you attempting to blackmail me into an alliance with NW0 NW0 cannot be trusted Plus what does NW0 have to offer FLY? Beyond having you around more often to annoy me? !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:39 PM so what your argument to think THAT i drop this question to accuse your alliance instead of asking why you sister alliance did that this round? ScenicRouteToday at 5:39 PM Why don’t you ask FBV? Why don’t you ask ROG? !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:40 PM i asked FBV - they are silent ScenicRouteToday at 5:40 PM Where does it say FLY??? But you come to me :joy::joy: 3 alliances are challenging NW0 and you come to FLY:joy::joy: !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:41 PM You come to me when we registered last round for BTV bunker? ScenicRouteToday at 5:41 PM FBV didn’t even fight for F2! !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:41 PM Pretty straight to do the same ScenicRouteToday at 5:42 PM You tried to blackmail me !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:42 PM whats blackmail? ScenicRouteToday at 5:42 PM Look at what you did with ROG! Get a dictionary or google the word It is not my job to educate you !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:43 PM ok what you trying to view as blackmail ScenicRouteToday at 5:45 PM !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:47 PM We are not going to contest currently possessed bunker if its matters, not interested in crossing your interests ScenicRouteToday at 5:48 PM You want to challenge, go ahead You want war, keep talking without apologizing for your words Pretty simple and straightforward You came to me when I am FLY FLY has NOTHING to do with facility #2 The last time I tried to speak up for another alliance you tried to push an alliance with NW0 as the solution....that is blackmail FLY will not be bought, manipulated or continue with this !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:51 PM Thus i quoted specifically your words about BTV bunker - and in my question there are absolutly no words that i accuse specifically or FLY *you or fly ScenicRouteToday at 5:51 PM Until you admit you were wrong, stop the recruitment messages to my players and apologize for all of this nonsense.... this is finished and so is the NAP !gﾉﾚｲ!Today at 5:59 PM How could i apologize for what i did not mentioned? In this case I apologize for sending message about FBV registration on our facility to you. ScenicRouteToday at 8:09 PM And you just ruined that apology with your nonsense in the other chat ScenicRouteYesterday at 1:25 AM You will no longer be needed in that chat If you want to choose another in your place, have them message me
